Microfilm images, like paper documents, contain
human-readable information. While such images require magnification for
eye-legible display or printing, micrographics equipment requirements
are straightforward. Appropriate display and printing devices have been
widely available for decades. Compared to documents stored in electronic
formats, micrographics implementations have minimal hardware and
software dependencies.
With its long history of
standardization, micrographics technology offers exceptional
compatibility and interchangeability of recorded information among the
products of different vendors. Micrographics users can exchange
documents worldwide with confidence that the documents will be viewable
and printable by available equipment. Similarly, users can have a high
degree of confidence that micrographic images created today will be
compatible with display and printing equipment introduced in the future.
As with paper documents, the legal
status of microfilm images is well established for both recordkeeping
requirements and admissibility in evidence. Among pertinent
statutory provisions, the Uniform Photographic Copies of Business and
Public Records as Evidence Act (UPA), as well as the Federal Rules of
Evidence (FRE) and Uniform Rules of Evidence (URE), specifically mention
microfilm as an acceptable medium for document reproduction.
Because microfilm is easily and
economically duplicated, it is often the preferred medium for vital
records protection and other document backup operations. Microfilm's
compactness and unmatched stability are valuable attributes in such
situations.